RyanSmithAT: Noticeably absent from this year's GTC keynote: 'The more you buy, the more you save'.

But the longer they sit on this product, the worse it's going to get forвЂ¦ RyanSmithAT: I reckon Intel's in a bit of a bind here.So I don't think this was meant to be the market launch. RyanSmithAT: It did get pulled by Newegg.RyanSmithAT: Just how many storage devices are you looking at adding? While the consumer situation isn'tвЂ¦.gavbon86: Breaking News: Addictive chemicals are hard to stop consuming.gavbon86: Got to love Sky Sport's captioning sometimes.gavbon86: RT My Blue Screens of Death are much cooler than yours!.The results here indicate that either CPU platform would result in very similar performance on the ColdFusion MX 6.1 application server. The JVM isn't optimized for either CPU architecture, so the test is completely impacted by the hardware itself. The difference between the Opteron and Xeon here was approximately 3%, which isn't far off our deviation of 2.5%. We left ColdFusion configured with 8 simultaneous requests, we enabled trusted cache, and we set the JVM to 512MB for minimum and maximum heap size as recommended in the Macromedia performance documentation. ColdFusion MX 6.1 was the version that we used, with the August 2004 updater applied. Today, ColdFusion runs on top of a J2EE server, and is compiled into Java byte code, which is then executed in the J2EE server's Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It was originally developed in C++ and then interpreted into HTML by the ColdFusion runtime service. Macromedia ColdFusion MX is a rapid application development language that started off under a company named Allaire.

Does intel burn test work on amd